Archive for technology

The Art of Integration: A Proposal

Posted in Blogroll with tags , , , , , , , on May 10, 2009 by Jack

Is there a purpose to art? Is the act of expression strictly one of self-obsession, the purging of one’s own neurotic indulgences? Or, perhaps, is there an underlying piece of information, unknown even to the artist himself, through which the artist is but a conduit?
Art has many functions:  from the historic storytelling on the walls of pre-historic caves to the expression of ideals in Greek mythology; from the reverential masterpieces of the Renaissance to the explosions of the sub-conscious in the 20th century. Art, at its core, is a form of communication. But, from an evolutionist’s viewpoint, what purpose has art served to the development of human culture? Creativity exists within all of us. Human’s are not the biggest, strongest nor fastest of the creatures, and yet we have conquered them all. The Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon are but bones in a museum. It is our human creative instinct that has allowed us to conquer and thrive.

But art, art is a focusing of creativity. But to what end? We have passed through all the platforms of historical development: classical, Romantic, modern, post-modern, deconstructionist, and ultimately each artistic reach finds a nihilistic wall waiting for it. Art itself must evolve or it becomes a fossil on a wall, wasting away as the hushed crowds queue past, reading their pamphlets explaining to them that this ancient work is IMPORTANT.

We have put art on a pedestal and in doing so we have detached, as a culture, from the act of creativity. Each piece is destined to be slowly eaten by the tired teeth of time. Perhaps it is still communicating, like a Rumi poem, its life still ripe upon our lips. But for most art, in another 10,000 years, will it still be communicating?

I would like to propose that there is another path. A path that is built upon the supposition that art has a very distinct evolutionary purpose. We have reached the point, technologically, where we can easily begin to integrate all the various forms of art – visual, aural, tactile. Opera was perhaps the first medium, followed by theater and then most recently by film (which, currently, is art’s most powerful incarnation.) But what is the new form and to what purpose will this form serve? Technology has divined that we have but scratched the surface of what is possible. We have yet to really grasp the tools available to us and to harness their potential.

My theory is this: What if the purpose of art is to guide humanity to its next evolutionary step – the ignition of consciousness. But even more than guide, to be an actual tool that is part of the process in the activation of conscious awareness. Oh, you say, we are not ready for this! People will resist, people aren’t ready. This is true. But enough people are ready for us to begin experimenting with the possibility that together we can create a world of authenticity, rather than projections of our egoic illusions.

I will attempt to lay out my blueprint, piece by piece, so as to illuminate the details of what I have proposed. But I realize that each artist and each individual is but a thread in this beautiful tapestry. Therefore, it is my intention to generate attention and ultimately input, so that each piece of the puzzle can be put into place. It is time to create the new mythology, a story that cannot exist without the observer; a story that evolves by the very act of observing. An event that can only exist in the present, and can only communicate when the observer has aligned him or her self in the now, in the act, in the unfolding. The audience will become the art itself, and in that process, will begin to take the next step in human evolution: the integrated conscious being.

The Technology Mirror

Posted in Blogroll, Music with tags , , , , , , , , , on May 9, 2008 by Jack

Last night as I was falling asleep, I began thinking about the dreams I would have. I recently heard someone describe the dreaming process as the brain defragging itself of all the information, both intellectual and emotional, it had gathered during the day. It’s an interesting analogy – brain defragmentation. But then I thought that perhaps the reason PC’s need to be defragged is because we have subconsciously imparted our own behavior – the subconscious processing of the dream state – onto the computer.

There is a myth that technology is perfect because it can process billions of pieces of information instantly, or it can beat us at a chess game. The problem is, we created computers, and it seems that an imperfect creature cannot create a perfect machine. The machine itself is a reflection of our desires, both conscious and subconscious, and reveals itself in the process of the machine. Also, the more complex the machine the higher the probability there is for errors, anomalies and what we have come to fear most: “bugs.” So it seems that in every thing we create, we impart upon it not only our ingenuity, but also our subconscious irregularities. I think computers are a fine example of that (and if you’re a Mac user, you must admit there have been problems at some point and time.)

So, since our subconscious desires and neuroses are present in many of the technologies we have created, wouldn’t it seem logical that we can explore our psyche through these very machines. Take , for example, the Roland TR-808 drum machine. This drum machine was created to be used in place of a drummer – and was hated by percussionists for that very reason. Also, the sounds it produced were considered inferior not only to live drums but to other contemporary drum machines. But five years after it was discontinued, it was embraced by a handful of club music producers who found that its “deficiencies” were actually perfect for the new sound that was being created – house, techno and electro – and a whole new world of creativity was born.

It begs the question as to whether the creators of the TR-808, in their quest to produce a tool for studio musicians, and their subsequent failure, imparted in the machine a piece of their own subconscious, perhaps a yearning for the future that was later recognized by those with no prejudice about what it was “meant” to be, and instead discovered what this machine’s true nature was. One person’s failure is another’s muse.

What is more interesting is that these machines have quirks that make them highly coveted. Take E-mu’s SP-1200 or the Akai MPC series that each had their own idiosyncratic tendencies that ultimately produced music that was less mathematical in its performance and ironically, more human because of its flaws.

We, as a culture, seek through technology the lofty goal of perfection through control. Every wire, every circuit is produced to achieve the most perfect state available. But the history of these creations is that each machine exhibits certain “flaws” – flaws that are there because we have imparted them without even being conscious of it. Therefore, the search for perfection is a pointless undertaking, since, first, we can never achieve it as we ourselves can never exemplify it, and secondly, because in our bold strives towards perfection, we miss the beauty of what we have created.

Soul, man

Posted in Blogroll with tags , , , , , , on February 26, 2008 by Jack

So I just got done watching Mary J. Blige perform on the VH1 series, “Storytellers,” and I was blown away. It wasn’t just that she could sing (trust me, she can), but it was the amount of emotion, the soul, that she was transmitting on that stage. What made the performance even more enthralling was that she talked with the audience about each song before she sang them. She became really emotional at times and I could hear where all that pathos comes from – she hasn’t had an easy life and she has been able to translate that, even more so, transmute that through her singing.

I’ve always had a thing for soul music – that raw emotion that comes from hardship, experience. One of my favorite albums is Curtis Mayfield’s “Superfly.” What I love about this record is not only is the music fantastic – orchestrated funk – but that he’s telling a story about a socially relevant topic: drugs in the ghetto. But the album has so much soul because you can feel Mayfield’s own anguish throughout, as well as his hope for things to get better.

Music is so fascinating because on one level it’s just a series of frequencies put into a particular order, which doesn’t seem really all that interesting, but then you hear it and it triggers something in the brain – emotions, thoughts, passions, anger, heartbreak. We’re wired for sound and soul music targets that in a way many other forms of artistic expression just can’t. It goes straight for the heart.

But what exactly is soul music, especially when you think about electronic music? It’s music made by machines. Growing up in the Midwest, if it didn’t have a guitar in it most people don’t think it’s music. I’d always be debating about how an instrument doesn’t have to be “played” to be considered music. In fact, when I first heard proper techno, I was caught by how much soul was being conveyed in this music that strove to be as inorganic, compositionally, as possible. It was music that seemed to be searching for the soul in the machine.

I’ve always been attracted to the fact that despite the evolution of technology, we still grasp at the humanity within cold wires and hardened steel. Techno, in some ways, epitomizes that by saying, “we’ll take these machines you’re trying to inject us with and make something beautiful with them.” The machine has simply become a new medium for human expression.

Music isn’t about the format, the instruments, or even to some degree, the ability – it’s about the soul. When a song can touch or move someone, when it can create an empathic bond between two people, it becomes something more than just sounds and sequences, it transcends its parts. Soul music is about the expression of the human experience and it doesn’t matter how you do it, it just needs to be done.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.